
Celeron T3500

Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron T3500 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron T3500 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron T3500 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron T3500
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +685.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 573.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron T3500.
Trade-offs
- ❌148.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron T3500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron T3500 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T3500
The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 177.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB (total)+3100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | — | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,055 | 17,685+1576% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T3500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3500) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron T3500 was priced at $80, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($80 vs $199), Celeron T3500 was $119 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3500 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 148.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-60% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2 | 88.9+573% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














