Core 2 Duo T5750
VS
A6-3600

Core 2 Duo T5750 vs A6-3600

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A6-3600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5750 is positioned at rank 28 and the A6-3600 is on rank 613, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10888%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10288%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7470%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2250%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1783%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1559%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
893%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
881%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
803%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
803%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
794%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
772%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
761%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
758%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
751%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
99%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
97%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
100%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
100%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
100%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
99%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
99%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
99%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
98%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
98%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo T5750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-3600 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo T5750 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 68% cheaper ($8 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+216%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5750 and A6-3600

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A6-3600

The A6-3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,718 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3600 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 2.4 GHz on the A6-3600 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A6-3600 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-3600 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5750 scores 1,738 against the A6-3600's 1,718 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 360 vs 253, a 34.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750 vs 0 kB on the A6-3600.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,738+1%
1,718
Geekbench 6 Single
360+42%
253
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-3600 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus DDR3-1866 on the A6-3600 — the A6-3600 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3600 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) vs 16 (A6-3600) — the A6-3600 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750) and A55,A75 (A6-3600).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
Socket
PGA478
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1866+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Core 2 Duo T5750) vs AMD-V (A6-3600). The A6-3600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop, A6-3600 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3600 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Budget Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($8 vs $25), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $17 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T5750 delivers 217.3 pts/$ vs 68.7 pts/$ for the A6-3600 — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 103.9% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750A6-3600
MSRP
$95
Avg Price (30d)
$8-68%
$25
Performance per Dollar
217.3+216%
68.7
Release Date
2008
2011