
Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Core 2 Duo T5750

Core 2 Duo T7200

Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7200 is positioned at rank 29 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7200
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($6) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+32%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($6) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7200 and Core 2 Duo T5750

Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.

Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7200 and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7200 scores 1,717 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7200 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,717 | 1,738+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 360 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 680 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At current prices ($6 vs $8), the Core 2 Duo T7200 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7200 delivers 286.2 pts/$ vs 217.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T5750 — making the Core 2 Duo T7200 the 27.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7200 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $286 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6-25% | $8 |
| Performance per Dollar | 286.2+32% | 217.3 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















