Core 2 Duo T7200
VS
A6-9500E

Core 2 Duo T7200 vs A6-9500E

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7200

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
VS
AMD

A6-9500E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7200 is positioned at rank 29 and the A6-9500E is on rank 609, so the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7200

#17
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
171%
#18
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
168%
#19
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
155%
#20
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
154%
#21
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
152%
#23
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
147%
#24
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
141%
#25
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
141%
#26
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
137%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
100%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
100%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
99%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
99%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
97%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
90%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
89%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10150%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7369%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1538%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
881%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
870%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
792%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
762%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
751%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
748%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
741%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#609
A6-9500E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7200A6-9500E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($6)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7200 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7200A6-9500E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($6)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7200 and A6-9500E

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7200

The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.

AMD

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T7200 and A6-9500E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E — a 51.9% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7200 scores 1,717 against the A6-9500E's 1,741 — a 1.4% lead for the A6-9500E. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7200A6-9500E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,717
1,741+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7200 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 versus DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E — the A6-9500E supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200) and AMD AM4 (A6-9500E).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7200A6-9500E
Socket
PGA478
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR4-2400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200) / not specified (A6-9500E). The A6-9500E includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7200A6-9500E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget