Core 2 Quad Q9450
VS
Core i3-5020U

Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Core i3-5020U

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9450

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-5020U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is positioned at rank 1049 and the Core i3-5020U is on rank 598, so the Core i3-5020U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
44594%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
42137%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
30595%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9217%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7301%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6387%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3658%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3610%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3287%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3287%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3250%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3118%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3078%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
100%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
99%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
98%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
98%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
97%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
97%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
95%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
94%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
93%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
92%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
91%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
91%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
87%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
87%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5020U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
100%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#586
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
789%
#587
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
777%
#588
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
713%
#589
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
710%
#590
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
704%
#592
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
680%
#593
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
652%
#594
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
651%
#595
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
633%
#598
Core i3-5020U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-5020U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9450Core i3-5020U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9450Core i3-5020U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Core i3-5020U

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9450

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i3-5020U

The Core i3-5020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,232 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-5020U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-5020U — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q9450 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-5020U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Core i3-5020U's 2,232 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-5020U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5020U.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Core i3-5020U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.67 GHz+21%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+21%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB (total)+4700%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
2,208
2,232+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-5020U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Core i3-5020U
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9450) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-5020U). The Core i3-5020U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 5500), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5020U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Core i3-5020U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 5500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop