
Core 2 Quad Q9450

Xeon E5462
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Xeon E5462 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Xeon E5462 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Xeon E5462: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008Why buy it
- β Costs $26 less on MSRP ($316 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
- β Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,208 vs 2,213).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5462, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- β18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon E5462
2007Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5462 better than Core 2 Quad Q9450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Xeon E5462 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9450
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

Xeon E5462
The Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007β2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $797.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Xeon E5462 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5462 β a 4.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5462 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5462 uses Harpertown (2007β2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Xeon E5462's 2,213 β a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5462. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5462.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Xeon E5462 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 2.8 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007β2009) | Harpertown (2007β2008) |
| PassMark | 2,208 | 2,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 363 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,239 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon E5462 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Xeon E5462 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9450) / VT-x (Xeon E5462). Primary use case: Xeon E5462 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E5462 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4000+.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Xeon E5462 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x |
| Target Use | β | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 was priced at $316, while the Xeon E5462 came in at $342. On launch pricing ($316 vs $342), Core 2 Quad Q9450 was $26 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 delivers 7.0 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5462 β making the Core 2 Quad Q9450 the 7.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Xeon E5462 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316-8% | $342 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0+8% | 6.5 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














