
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Pro A8-8600B

Core 2 Quad Q9450

Pro A8-8600B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is positioned at rank 1049 and the Pro A8-8600B is on rank 986, so the Pro A8-8600B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9450
Performance Per Dollar Pro A8-8600B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pro A8-8600B

Core 2 Quad Q9450
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

Pro A8-8600B
The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pro A8-8600B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 11.6% clock advantage for the Pro A8-8600B (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9450.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 3 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+66% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+500% | 2048 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 2,208 | 2,203 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Pro A8-8600B debuted at $150. At current prices ($15 vs $25), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 delivers 147.2 pts/$ vs 88.1 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Core 2 Quad Q9450 the 50.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $150-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 147.2+67% | 88.1 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















