Core 2 Quad Q9450
VS
Pro A8-8600B

Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Pro A8-8600B

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9450

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Pro A8-8600B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is positioned at rank 1049 and the Pro A8-8600B is on rank 986, so the Pro A8-8600B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
44594%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
42137%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
30595%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9217%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7301%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6387%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3658%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3610%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3287%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3287%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3250%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3118%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3078%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
100%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
99%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
98%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
98%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
97%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
97%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
95%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
94%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
93%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
92%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
91%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
91%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
87%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
87%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pro A8-8600B

#974
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1997%
#975
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1968%
#976
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1807%
#977
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1799%
#978
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1782%
#980
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1721%
#981
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1650%
#982
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1647%
#983
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1603%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
98%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
98%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
97%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
96%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
96%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
95%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pro A8-8600B (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3/DDR3L-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9450Pro A8-8600B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9450Pro A8-8600B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+67%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pro A8-8600B

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9450

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Pro A8-8600B

The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Pro A8-8600B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 11.6% clock advantage for the Pro A8-8600B (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9450.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Pro A8-8600B
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.67 GHz
3 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+66%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
12 MB (total)+500%
2048 kB
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,208
2,203
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Pro A8-8600B
Socket
LGA775
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Pro A8-8600B debuted at $150. At current prices ($15 vs $25), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 delivers 147.2 pts/$ vs 88.1 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Core 2 Quad Q9450 the 50.2% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9450Pro A8-8600B
MSRP
$316
$150-53%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-40%
$25
Performance per Dollar
147.2+67%
88.1
Release Date
2008
2015