Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Quad Q9450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Quad Q9450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $274 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
✅Delivers 662.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core 2 Quad Q9450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core 2 Quad Q9450

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,208 vs 2,239).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Core 2 Quad Q9450?

Yes. Celeron G4900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 31 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in $274 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $316 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 662.9% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 7.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Quad Q9450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Core 2 Quad Q9450

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Core 2 Quad Q9450's 2,208 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron G4900T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9450.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Quad Q9450
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+9%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+9%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2033%	12 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark	2,239+1%	2,208
Geekbench 6 Single	623	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Quad Q9450
Socket	LGA1151	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9450). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Quad Q9450
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900T was priced at $42, while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 came in at $316. On launch pricing ($42 vs $316), Celeron G4900T was $274 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900T delivers 53.3 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q9450 — making the Celeron G4900T the 153.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP	$42-87%	$316
Performance per Dollar	53.3+661%	7.0
Release Date	2018	2008

Search Celeron G4900T on Amazon

Search Core 2 Quad Q9450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.