
Core 2 Quad Q9450

Core i5-2520M
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Core i5-2520M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Core i5-2520M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Deadlock
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Core i5-2520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,208 vs 2,241).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-2520M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2520M
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $91 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- β Delivers 42.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Quad Q9450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2520M better than Core 2 Quad Q9450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Core i5-2520M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9450
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-2520M
The Core i5-2520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,241 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2520M offers 2 cores / 4 threads β the Core 2 Quad Q9450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-2520M β a 18.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2520M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2520M uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Core i5-2520M's 2,241 β a 1.5% lead for the Core i5-2520M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2520M.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 3.2 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+6% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+2033% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007β2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 2,208 | 2,241+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 16 |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9450) / true (Core i5-2520M). The Core i5-2520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2520M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 was priced at $316, while the Core i5-2520M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($316 vs $225), Core i5-2520M was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 delivers 7.0 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-2520M β making the Core i5-2520M the 35.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $225-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 10.0+43% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














