Core 2 Solo SU3500
VS
A4 PRO-7300B

Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs A4 PRO-7300B

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A4 PRO-7300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is positioned at rank 1195 and the A4 PRO-7300B is on rank 607, so the A4 PRO-7300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3500

#1183
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5239%
#1184
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5163%
#1185
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4739%
#1186
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4718%
#1187
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4675%
#1189
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4514%
#1190
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4329%
#1191
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4321%
#1192
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4205%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
100%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
98%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
91%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
91%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
89%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4 PRO-7300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10690%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10101%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7334%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2209%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1750%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1531%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
877%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
865%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
788%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
788%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
779%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
758%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
747%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
744%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
738%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
99%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
98%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
97%
#607
A4 PRO-7300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
99%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
97%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
97%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
97%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4 PRO-7300B leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500A4 PRO-7300B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500A4 PRO-7300B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and A4 PRO-7300B

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.

AMD

A4 PRO-7300B

The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A4 PRO-7300B offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 PRO-7300B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 versus 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B — a 96.3% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A4 PRO-7300B uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 scores 1,468 against the A4 PRO-7300B's 1,458 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3500.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500A4 PRO-7300B
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
4 GHz+186%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+192%
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+200%
1024 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,468
1,458
Geekbench 6 Single
375
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4 PRO-7300B uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500A4 PRO-7300B
Socket
BGA956
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Solo SU3500) / AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B). The A4 PRO-7300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500A4 PRO-7300B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop