Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs A6-5400B
Core 2 Solo SU3500
A6-5400B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is positioned at rank 1195 and the A6-5400B is on rank 699, so the A6-5400B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3500
Performance Per Dollar A6-5400B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | A6-5400B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | A6-5400B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and A6-5400B
Core 2 Solo SU3500
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.
A6-5400B
The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A6-5400B offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5400B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B — a 92.3% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A6-5400B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 scores 1,468 against the A6-5400B's 1,465 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3500. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs 0 kB on the A6-5400B.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | A6-5400B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+171% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+177% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,468 | 1,465 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 380 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-5400B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | A6-5400B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Solo SU3500) / AMD-V (A6-5400B). The A6-5400B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7540D), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | A6-5400B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 7540D |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Business Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and A6-5400B
