Core 2 Solo SU3500
VS
Athlon II X3 415e

Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Athlon II X3 415e

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 415e

3 Cores3 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is positioned at rank 1195 and the Athlon II X3 415e is on rank 798, so the Athlon II X3 415e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3500

#1183
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5239%
#1184
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5163%
#1185
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4739%
#1186
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4718%
#1187
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4675%
#1189
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4514%
#1190
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4329%
#1191
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4321%
#1192
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4205%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
100%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
98%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
91%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
91%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
89%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 415e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15783%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14913%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10828%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3262%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2584%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2260%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1295%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1278%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1163%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1163%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1150%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1119%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1104%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1099%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1089%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
99%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
99%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
99%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
99%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
99%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
98%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
98%
#807
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
98%
#808
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
98%
#809
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X3 415e delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500Athlon II X3 415e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X3 415e stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($15 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500Athlon II X3 415e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon II X3 415e

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.

AMD

Athlon II X3 415e

The Athlon II X3 415e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,481 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon II X3 415e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 415e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 versus 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X3 415e — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 415e (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X3 415e uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 scores 1,468 against the Athlon II X3 415e's 1,481 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X3 415e. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 415e.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Athlon II X3 415e
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
3 / 3+200%
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+79%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+92%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,468
1,481
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X3 415e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Athlon II X3 415e
Socket
BGA956
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 415e debuted at $75. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Athlon II X3 415e is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3500 delivers 97.9 pts/$ vs 98.7 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 415e — making the Athlon II X3 415e the 0.9% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP
$262
$75-71%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
97.9
98.7
Release Date
2009
2010