Core Duo T2050
VS
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Core Duo T2050 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

Intel

Core Duo T2050

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2050 is positioned at rank 86 and the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is on rank 1185, so the Core Duo T2050 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2050

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#74
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
251%
#75
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
247%
#76
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
227%
#77
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
226%
#78
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
224%
#80
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
216%
#81
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
207%
#82
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
207%
#83
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
201%
#86
Core Duo T2050
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
99%
#98
N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325

#1173
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4771%
#1174
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4701%
#1175
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4315%
#1176
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4296%
#1177
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4257%
#1179
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4111%
#1180
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3941%
#1181
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3935%
#1182
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3829%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
98%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
98%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
95%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
92%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
92%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
91%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
89%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
87%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Duo T2050 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Duo T2050Athlon Neo X2 L325
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Duo T2050Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2050 and Athlon Neo X2 L325

Intel

Core Duo T2050

The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2050 and Athlon Neo X2 L325 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2050. The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Athlon Neo X2 L325's 615 — a 5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

FeatureCore Duo T2050Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz+7%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Congo (2009)
PassMark
585
615+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Duo T2050Athlon Neo X2 L325
Socket
PGA478
ASB1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0