Core Duo T2050
VS
Celeron U3400

Core Duo T2050 vs Celeron U3400

Intel

Core Duo T2050

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Celeron U3400

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2050 is positioned at rank 86 and the Celeron U3400 is on rank 1172, so the Core Duo T2050 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2050

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#74
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
251%
#75
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
247%
#76
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
227%
#77
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
226%
#78
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
224%
#80
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
216%
#81
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
207%
#82
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
207%
#83
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
201%
#86
Core Duo T2050
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
99%
#98
N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3400

#1160
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4386%
#1161
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4321%
#1162
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3967%
#1163
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3949%
#1164
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3913%
#1166
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3779%
#1167
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3623%
#1168
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3617%
#1169
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3520%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
100%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
98%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
97%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
97%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
94%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
92%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
91%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Duo T2050 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron U3400 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Duo T2050Celeron U3400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Duo T2050Celeron U3400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2050 and Celeron U3400

Intel

Core Duo T2050

The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Celeron U3400

The Celeron U3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2050 and Celeron U3400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 0.07 GHz on the Celeron U3400 — a 183.2% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2050 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.06 GHz). The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron U3400 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Celeron U3400's 575 — a 1.7% lead for the Core Duo T2050. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2050 vs 2 MB on the Celeron U3400.

FeatureCore Duo T2050Celeron U3400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz+2186%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz+51%
1.06 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark
585+2%
575
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron U3400 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Duo T2050Celeron U3400
Socket
PGA478
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%