
Core Duo T2400 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Core Duo T2400

Ryzen 9 5900X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core Duo T2400 is positioned at rank #1205 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2400
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($294) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2099%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($294) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2400 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Core Duo T2400
The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 89.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.83 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Duo T2400 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2400 scores 1,488 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 185.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2400 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 4.8 GHz+162% |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | 3.7 GHz+102% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,488 | 38,955+2518% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core Duo T2400) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2400) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core Duo T2400 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294-46% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $350 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















