Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core Duo T2400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core Duo T2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core Duo T2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 3W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 3W, a 1W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,488 vs 1,496).
❌
1.7% HIGHER MSRP
$294 MSRPvs$289 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo SU7300 better than Core Duo T2400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Duo T2400 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo SU7300 comes in $5 cheaper on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Duo T2400 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.3% better value on MSRP (5.2 vs 5.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo SU7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Core Duo T2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 — a 33.9% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2400 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Duo T2400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Core Duo T2400's 1,488 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2400.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core Duo T2400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	1.83 GHz+41%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	1.83 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,496	1,488
Geekbench 6 Single	188	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	338	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core Duo T2400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 — the Core 2 Duo SU7300 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs 16 (Core Duo T2400) — the Core Duo T2400 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) and 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400).

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core Duo T2400
Socket	BGA956	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+60%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop, Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core Duo T2400
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 was priced at $289, while the Core Duo T2400 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($289 vs $294), Core 2 Duo SU7300 was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SU7300 delivers 5.2 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core Duo T2400 — making the Core 2 Duo SU7300 the 2.3% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SU7300	Core Duo T2400
MSRP	$289-2%	$294
Performance per Dollar	5.2+2%	5.1
Release Date	2009	2006

Search Core 2 Duo SU7300 on Amazon

Search Core Duo T2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.