PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $312 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 18,980).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +88.9% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 21.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
321.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$97 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $312 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +88.9% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 21.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 18,980).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌
321.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$97 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i3-10105F?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 88.9% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data, 321.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 413.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 88.9% more average FPS across 26 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 321.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 321.6% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it gives you a 88.9% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 91.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i3-10105F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i3-10105F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	181 FPS	284 FPS
medium	143 FPS	268 FPS
high	113 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	238 FPS
medium	119 FPS	200 FPS
high	95 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	159 FPS
medium	72 FPS	134 FPS
high	57 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i7-13700K

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	223 FPS	689 FPS
medium	223 FPS	580 FPS
high	206 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	595 FPS
medium	203 FPS	525 FPS
high	184 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	348 FPS
medium	164 FPS	314 FPS
high	139 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i7-13700K

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	223 FPS	648 FPS
medium	223 FPS	530 FPS
high	223 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	591 FPS
medium	223 FPS	491 FPS
high	223 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	223 FPS	434 FPS
medium	223 FPS	374 FPS
high	223 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	290 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i7-13700K

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	223 FPS	970 FPS
medium	223 FPS	883 FPS
high	223 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	829 FPS
medium	223 FPS	740 FPS
high	223 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	223 FPS	567 FPS
medium	223 FPS	515 FPS
high	223 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core i3-10105F Open Core i7-13700K

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10105F and Core i7-13700K

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 134.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,461 vs 2,846, a 64.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,503 vs 18,980 (123.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 24+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.4 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark	8,912	45,784+414%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,461	2,846+95%
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,503	18,980+321%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Core i7-13700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) vs true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i3-10105F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Core i7-13700K
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-10105F launched at $97 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($97 vs $409), the Core i3-10105F is $312 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 19.7% better value option.