
Core i3-13100F

Core i5-10400F
Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 134.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 58W instead of 65W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,454 vs 2,272).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 134.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-13100F better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F
The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 11.7% lead for the Core i3-13100F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,272 vs 1,454, a 43.9% lead for the Core i3-13100F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 5,783 (26.9% advantage for the Core i3-13100F). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,649+12% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,272+56% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577+31% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i3-13100F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-13100F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-13100F) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i3-13100F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i3-13100F) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-13100F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100F was priced at $109, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($109 vs $160), Core i3-13100F was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100F delivers 134.4 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i3-13100F the 49.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-32% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 134.4+65% | 81.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














