Core i3-3130M vs Celeron G1850

Core i3-3130M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013

Celeron G1850

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i3-3130M

2 / 4

1,906

0.0%

1,907

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3130M is positioned at rank 22 and the Celeron G1850 is on rank 450, so the Core i3-3130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3130M

#10

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

154%

#11

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

152%

#12

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

139%

#13

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

139%

#14

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

137%

#16

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

133%

#17

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

127%

#18

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

127%

#19

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

124%

#22

Core i3-3130M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

100%

#23

Core 2 Duo T5550

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5

96%

#24

Core 2 Duo T7100

MSRP: $197|Avg: $15

95%

#27

Pentium 2030M

MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A

92%

#28

Core 2 Duo T5750

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8

91%

#29

Core 2 Duo T7200

MSRP: $286|Avg: $6

90%

#30

Core i5-3230M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $13

90%

#31

Atom D525

MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A

90%

#32

Atom x7835RE

MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A

89%

#33

Core 2 Duo P8400

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1850

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

6866%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

6488%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

4711%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

1419%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

1124%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

983%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

563%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

556%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

506%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

506%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

500%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

487%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

480%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

478%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

474%

#353

Core i9-11900T

MSRP: $439|Avg: $413

99%

#354

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

99%

#355

Core i9-10900

MSRP: $483|Avg: $426

99%

#356

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#357

Core i9-10900K

MSRP: $499|Avg: $500

99%

#358

Celeron G4930

MSRP: $42|Avg: $57

99%

#359

Ryzen 7 2700E

MSRP: $329|Avg: $329

98%

#360

Ryzen Embedded V2516

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

98%

#361

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442

98%

#450

Celeron G1850

MSRP: $42|Avg: $30

100%

#451

Celeron G3900T

MSRP: $42|Avg: $70

100%

#453

Phenom X4 9100e

MSRP: $200|Avg: $35

99%

#457

Celeron G3950

MSRP: $52|Avg: $30

99%

#463

Athlon X2 340

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G1850 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-3130M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Core i3-3130M	Celeron G1850
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)	✅ More affordable ($30)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G1850 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 87% cheaper ($30 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Core i3-3130M	Celeron G1850
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+650%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)	✅ More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i3-3130M Benchmark Check

Celeron G1850 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3130M and Celeron G1850

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3130M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1850's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G1850 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the Celeron G1850's 1,907 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1850. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Celeron G1850
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,906	1,907
Geekbench 6 Single	—	543
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	945

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1850 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-3130M versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 — the Core i3-3130M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i3-3130M) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850).

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Celeron G1850
Socket	PGA988	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+53233%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32	32 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-3130M) vs VT-x (Celeron G1850). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3130M) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1850) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M; Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.