Core i3-3130M
VS
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Core i3-3130M vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Core i3-3130M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3130M is positioned at rank 22 and the Core 2 Quad Q8300 is on rank 985, so the Core i3-3130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3130M

#10
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
154%
#11
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
152%
#12
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
139%
#13
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
139%
#14
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
137%
#16
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
133%
#17
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
127%
#18
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
127%
#19
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
124%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
96%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
95%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
92%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
91%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
90%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
90%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
90%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
89%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29105%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19968%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6016%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4168%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2387%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2145%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2145%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2035%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2027%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2009%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
95%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
100%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
99%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
96%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
96%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
95%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
95%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
94%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
94%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-3130M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($10 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2163%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3130M and Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3130M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3130M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300.

FeatureCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB (total)+1500%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,906
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-3130M) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.

FeatureCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-3130M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 debuted at $179.

FeatureCore i3-3130MCore 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP
$225
$179-20%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Release Date
2013
2008