
Core i3-350M vs Athlon II N370

Core i3-350M

Athlon II N370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-350M is positioned at rank 17 and the Athlon II N370 is on rank 923, so the Core i3-350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-350M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II N370
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-350M and Athlon II N370

Core i3-350M
The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II N370
The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-350M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II N370's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M versus 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 — a 161% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Core i3-350M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II N370 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-350M scores 1,088 against the Athlon II N370's 1,085 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-350M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 280 vs 220, a 24% lead for the Core i3-350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 420 (43% advantage for the Core i3-350M).
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.27 GHz | 2.5 GHz+826% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,088 | 1,085 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280+27% | 220 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650+55% | 420 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-350M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II N370 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-350M) vs 0 (Athlon II N370) — the Core i3-350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57 (Core i3-350M) and RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370).
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II N370). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II N370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop, Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-350M launched at $130 MSRP, while the Athlon II N370 debuted at $60. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Athlon II N370 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-350M delivers 108.8 pts/$ vs 108.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II N370 — making the Core i3-350M the 0.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Athlon II N370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $60-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.8 | 108.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















