CPU
GPU
Core i3-350M
Celeron E3200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-350M is positioned at rank 17 and the Celeron E3200 is on rank 683, so the Core i3-350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-350M
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+100%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-350M and Celeron E3200
Core i3-350M
The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.
Celeron E3200
The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.
Processing Power
The Core i3-350M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E3200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 159.6% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-350M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-350M scores 1,088 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron E3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 280 vs 340, a 19.4% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 610 (6.3% advantage for the Core i3-350M). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-350M vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3200.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.27 GHz | 2.4 GHz+789% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz | 2.4 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,088 | 1,090 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280 | 340+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650+7% | 610 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-350M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-350M versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 — the Core i3-350M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E3200 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-350M) vs 0 (Celeron E3200) — the Core i3-350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57 (Core i3-350M) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200).
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M) vs VT-x (Celeron E3200). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop, Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-350M launched at $130 MSRP, while the Celeron E3200 debuted at $43. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Celeron E3200 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-350M delivers 108.8 pts/$ vs 218.0 pts/$ for the Celeron E3200 — making the Celeron E3200 the 66.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-350M | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $43-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $5-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.8 | 218.0+100% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-350M and Celeron E3200
