Core i3-4020Y vs E1-2100

Core i3-4020Y vs E1-2100 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4020Y

2 / 4

1,448

+0.9%

1,435

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4020Y vs E1-2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4020Y vs E1-2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4020Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while E1-2100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.

E1-2100

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,435 vs 1,448).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4020Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4020Y better than E1-2100?

Yes. Core i3-4020Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4020Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4020Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4020Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4020Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4020Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4020Y vs E1-2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

E1-2100

The E1-2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4020Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-2100's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y versus 1 GHz on the E1-2100 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i3-4020Y. The Core i3-4020Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-2100 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4020Y scores 1,448 against the E1-2100's 1,435 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-4020Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4020Y vs 0 kB on the E1-2100.

Feature	Core i3-4020Y	E1-2100
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz+50%	1 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1024 kB+100%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,448	1,435

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4020Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-2100 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4020Y	E1-2100
Socket	FCBGA1168	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-4020Y) / not specified (E1-2100). The Core i3-4020Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the E1-2100 requires a dedicated GPU.