Core i3-4020Y vs Pentium M 735

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4020Y vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4020Y vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4020Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Pentium M 735 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,448 vs 1,459).
❌2338.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 21W.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 512W, a 491W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i3-4020Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4020Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 735 better than Core i3-4020Y?

Yes. Pentium M 735 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 735 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 735 is the better buy right now. Pentium M 735 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4020Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4020Y vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4020Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-4020Y has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Pentium M 735 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-4020Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4020Y scores 1,448 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4020Y vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.

Feature	Core i3-4020Y	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.7 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	1.7 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,448	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4020Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-4020Y versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Core i3-4020Y supports -580.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4020Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Core i3-4020Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-4020Y	Pentium M 735
Socket	FCBGA1168	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-4020Y) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Core i3-4020Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.