Core i3-4020Y vs Pentium M 735
Core i3-4020Y
Pentium M 735
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4020Y is positioned at rank 716 and the Pentium M 735 is on rank 1207, so the Core i3-4020Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4020Y
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 735
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4020Y | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4020Y | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4020Y and Pentium M 735
Core i3-4020Y
The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.
Pentium M 735
The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4020Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-4020Y has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Pentium M 735 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-4020Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4020Y scores 1,448 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4020Y vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Core i3-4020Y | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-76% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 1,448 | 1,459 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4020Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-4020Y versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Core i3-4020Y supports 305.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4020Y supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Core i3-4020Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-4020Y | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 2 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i3-4020Y) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Core i3-4020Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.
| Feature | Core i3-4020Y | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4200 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | None |
| Target Use | — | Mobile Legacy |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4020Y and Pentium M 735
