Core i3-4020Y
VS
Xeon X5272

Core i3-4020Y vs Xeon X5272

Intel

Core i3-4020Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4020Y is positioned at rank 716 and the Xeon X5272 is on rank 1029, so the Core i3-4020Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4020Y

#704
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1013%
#705
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
998%
#706
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
916%
#707
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
912%
#708
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
904%
#710
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
873%
#711
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
837%
#712
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
836%
#713
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
813%
#716
Core i3-4020Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5272

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
167599%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
31644%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
28115%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
21719%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
100%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
55%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
55%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
36%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
23%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-4020Y (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-4020YXeon X5272
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($76)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5272 (2007) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-4020YXeon X5272
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($76)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4020Y and Xeon X5272

Intel

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Xeon X5272

The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4020Y is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-4020Y scores 1,448 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5272. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4020Y vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5272.

FeatureCore i3-4020YXeon X5272
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.4 GHz+127%
L3 Cache
3 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,448
1,451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4020Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5272 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-4020Y versus DDR2 on the Xeon X5272 — the Core i3-4020Y supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5272 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 4 (Xeon X5272). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4020Y) vs 0 (Xeon X5272) — the Core i3-4020Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1168 (Core i3-4020Y) and Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon X5272).

FeatureCore i3-4020YXeon X5272
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+79900%
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
16
128 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support true virtualization. The Core i3-4020Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Xeon X5272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5272 targets Server.

FeatureCore i3-4020YXeon X5272
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true
Target Use
Server