Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-3360M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-3360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-3360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4130T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3360M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,876 vs 2,892).
❌Launch MSRP is still $124 MSRP, while Core i5-3360M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-3360M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3360M better than Core i3-4130T?

Yes. Core i5-3360M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3360M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3360M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3360M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-3360M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $124 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4130T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4130T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-3360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4130T

The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.

Core i5-3360M

The Core i5-3360M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4130T and Core i5-3360M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3360M — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3360M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-4130T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3360M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4130T scores 2,876 against the Core i5-3360M's 2,892 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-3360M. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-4130T	Core i5-3360M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,876	2,892
Geekbench 6 Single	890	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4130T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3360M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130T) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3360M).

Feature	Core i3-4130T	Core i5-3360M
Socket	LGA1150	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T) vs true (Core i5-3360M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4130T) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3360M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600; Core i5-3360M rivals AMD A10-4600M.