Core i3-4130T vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56

Core i3-4130T vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4130T

2 / 4

2,876

+1.4%

2,835

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4130T vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4130T vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4130T

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-56.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $124 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,835 vs 2,876).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4130T better than Turion 64 X2 TL-56?

Yes. Core i3-4130T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4130T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4130T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4130T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $124 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4130T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4130T vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4130T

The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad / Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90/65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,835 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4130T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion 64 X2 TL-56's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4130T. The Core i3-4130T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses Trinidad / Tyler (2007) (90/65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4130T scores 2,876 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-56's 2,835 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-4130T.

Feature	Core i3-4130T	Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+61%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-76%	90/65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Trinidad / Tyler (2007)
PassMark	2,876+1%	2,835
Geekbench 6 Single	890	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4130T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4130T	Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Socket	LGA1150	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-56). The Core i3-4130T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600.