Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-10100Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-10100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-10100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i3-10100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,892 vs 2,918).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i3-10100Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-10100Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10100Y better than Core i3-4150T?

Yes. Core i3-10100Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10100Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10100Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10100Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-10100Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4150T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10100Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-10100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4150T

The Core i3-4150T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $230.

Core i3-10100Y

The Core i3-10100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,918 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4150T and Core i3-10100Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4150T versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10100Y — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100Y (base: 3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-4150T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-10100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4150T scores 2,892 against the Core i3-10100Y's 2,918 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-10100Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150T vs 4 MB on the Core i3-10100Y.

Feature	Core i3-4150T	Core i3-10100Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
Base Clock	3 GHz+131%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,892	2,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4150T	Core i3-10100Y
Socket	LGA1150	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4150T) / not specified (Core i3-10100Y). The Core i3-4150T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i3-10100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150T targets Desktop Low Power.