Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-4210M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-4210M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-4210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,892 vs 2,899).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i5-4210M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4210M

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4150T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150T better than Core i5-4210M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4150T is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4210M pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4210M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4150T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4210M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4210M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-4210M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4150T

The Core i3-4150T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $230.

Core i5-4210M

The Core i5-4210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,899 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4150T and Core i5-4210M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4150T versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-4210M — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-4150T scores 2,892 against the Core i5-4210M's 2,899 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4210M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150T vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210M.

Feature	Core i3-4150T	Core i5-4210M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,892	2,899
Geekbench 6 Single	—	959

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4210M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4150T	Core i5-4210M
Socket	LGA1150	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4150T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4150T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4210M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150T targets Desktop Low Power, Core i5-4210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210M rivals A10-5750M.

Feature	Core i3-4150T	Core i5-4210M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4400	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	Mainstream Laptop