Core i3-4160T vs A10-5757M
Core i3-4160T
A10-5757M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4160T is positioned at rank 653 and the A10-5757M is on rank 1072, so the Core i3-4160T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4160T
Performance Per Dollar A10-5757M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4160T | A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4160T | A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4160T and A10-5757M
Core i3-4160T
The Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,087 points. Launch price was $142.
A10-5757M
The A10-5757M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4160T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-5757M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5757M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4160T versus 3.5 GHz on the A10-5757M — a 12.1% clock advantage for the A10-5757M (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-4160T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A10-5757M uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4160T scores 3,087 against the A10-5757M's 3,084 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4160T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160T vs 0 kB on the A10-5757M.
| Feature | Core i3-4160T | A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+24% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 3,087 | 3,084 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-5757M uses FP2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4160T versus 1600 on the A10-5757M — the A10-5757M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160T) and FP2 (A10-5757M).
| Feature | Core i3-4160T | A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FP2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | 1600+53233% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+104857500% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160T) vs true (A10-5757M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160T) and Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5757M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160T rivals A10-7800; A10-5757M rivals Core i3-3110M.
| Feature | Core i3-4160T | A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | Radeon HD 8650G |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4160T and A10-5757M
