Core i3-6167U vs Core i3-10110Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i3-10110Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i3-10110Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 512W, a 484W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10110Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,171).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1728.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110Y better than Core i3-6167U?

Yes. Core i3-10110Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10110Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10110Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10110Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i3-10110Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6167U and Core i3-10110Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y — a 38.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110Y (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i3-6167U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10110Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6167U scores 3,128 against the Core i3-10110Y's 3,171 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-10110Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6167U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y.

Feature	Core i3-6167U	Core i3-10110Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4 GHz+48%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+170%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	3,128	3,171+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.