Core i3-6167U vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

Core i3-6167U vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6167U

2 / 4

3,128

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 / 4

3,142

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6167U vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6167U vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,142).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌250% higher power demand at 28W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 8W instead of 28W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i3-6167U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1305G better than Core i3-6167U?

Yes. Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R1305G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6167U vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6167U and Ryzen Embedded R1305G share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i3-6167U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6167U scores 3,128 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6167U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	Core i3-6167U	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+80%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,128	3,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.