Core i3-6167U vs Xeon Gold 6262V

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6167U vs Xeon Gold 6262V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6167U vs Xeon Gold 6262V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 135W, a 107W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6262V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,155).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262V, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon Gold 6262V

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1000% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌382.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6262V better than Core i3-6167U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-6167U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6262V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6262V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1000% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6262V still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6262V comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015), 1000% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6167U vs Xeon Gold 6262V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

Xeon Gold 6262V

The Xeon Gold 6262V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,155 points. Launch price was $2,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6167U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262V offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262V has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262V — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6262V (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-6167U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6167U scores 3,128 against the Xeon Gold 6262V's 3,155 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262V. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6167U vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262V.

Feature	Core i3-6167U	Xeon Gold 6262V
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	24 / 48+1100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.6 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+42%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	33 MB+1000%
L2 Cache	512 kB	24 MB+4700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,128	3,155

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.