Core i3-6167U vs Core i5-6198DU

Intel

Core i3-6167U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-6198DU

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-6167U vs Core i5-6198DU Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i5-6198DU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i5-6198DU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6167U

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 28W instead of 512W, a 484W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6198DU can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-6198DU

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Core i3-6167U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,109 vs 3,128).
  • 1728.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6167U better than Core i5-6198DU?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-6198DU is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6167U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-6167U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-6167U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-6167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6167U vs Core i5-6198DU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-6167U

The Core i3-6167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Core i5-6198DU

The Core i5-6198DU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6167U and Core i5-6198DU share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6167U versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6198DU — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-6198DU (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-6167U scores 3,128 against the Core i5-6198DU's 3,109 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-6167U. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-6167UCore i5-6198DU
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+17%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,128
3,109
Geekbench 6 Single
946
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6198DU uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-6167UCore i5-6198DU
Socket
BGA1356
BGA
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-6167U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6198DU). The Core i5-6198DU includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core i3-6167U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6198DU targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6198DU rivals A9-9410.

FeatureCore i3-6167UCore i5-6198DU
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop