Core i3-7100H vs Core i7-2657M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7100H vs Core i7-2657M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7100H vs Core i7-2657M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7100H

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,450 vs 3,491).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Core i7-2657M

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7100H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2657M better than Core i3-7100H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-7100H is ahead with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2657M pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i7-2657M also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2657M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2657M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2657M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7100H vs Core i7-2657M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7100H and Core i7-2657M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100H (base: 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-7100H uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2657M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100H scores 3,450 against the Core i7-2657M's 3,491 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-2657M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,011 vs 535, a 61.6% lead for the Core i3-7100H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100H vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M.

Feature	Core i3-7100H	Core i7-2657M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+87%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-H (2017)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,450	3,491+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,011+89%	535

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2657M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2657M — the Core i3-7100H supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM175,QM175,CM238 (Core i3-7100H) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2657M).

Feature	Core i3-7100H	Core i7-2657M
Socket	BGA1440	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100H) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop, Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U; Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

Feature	Core i3-7100H	Core i7-2657M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Performance Laptop	Ultrabook