Core i3-7100H
VS
Phenom II X6 1075T

Core i3-7100H vs Phenom II X6 1075T

Intel

Core i3-7100H

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Phenom II X6 1075T

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7100H is positioned at rank 522 and the Phenom II X6 1075T is on rank 145, so the Phenom II X6 1075T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#510
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
680%
#511
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
670%
#512
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
615%
#513
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
613%
#514
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
607%
#516
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
586%
#517
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
562%
#518
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
561%
#519
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
546%
#522
Core i3-7100H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1075T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
2672%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
2525%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1833%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
552%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
437%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
383%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
219%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
195%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
189%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
187%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
186%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
184%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
100%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
98%
#145
Phenom II X6 1075T
MSRP: $245|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
98%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
98%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
97%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
97%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
97%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
96%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
96%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
96%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
96%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
96%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100H (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-7100HPhenom II X6 1075T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($245)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-H (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X6 1075T (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-7100HPhenom II X6 1075T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($245)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7100H and Phenom II X6 1075T

Intel

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

AMD

Phenom II X6 1075T

The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.

Processing Power

The Core i3-7100H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1075T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1075T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H versus 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1075T (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-7100H uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100H scores 3,450 against the Phenom II X6 1075T's 3,500 — a 1.4% lead for the Phenom II X6 1075T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,011 vs 679, a 39.3% lead for the Core i3-7100H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100H vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T.

FeatureCore i3-7100HPhenom II X6 1075T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
Thuban (2010)
PassMark
3,450
3,500+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,896
Geekbench 6 Single
1,011+49%
679
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,960
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1075T — the Core i3-7100H supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM175,QM175,CM238 (Core i3-7100H) and 880G,890GX,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1075T).

FeatureCore i3-7100HPhenom II X6 1075T
Socket
BGA1440
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X6 1075T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T). The Core i3-7100H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Phenom II X6 1075T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop, Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U; Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.

FeatureCore i3-7100HPhenom II X6 1075T
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Performance Laptop
Gaming