Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-4620

Intel

Core i3-9100F

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4620

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-4620 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-4620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-4620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100F

2019

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $2,044 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2130.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.1 vs 3.1 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4620

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,635 vs 6,704).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 69.1 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9100F better than Xeon E5-4620?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9100F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-9100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-9100F comes in $2,044 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4620 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2130.2% better value on MSRP (69.1 vs 3.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-4620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-9100F

The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

Intel

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100F packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-9100F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

FeatureCore i3-9100FXeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+62%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+64%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
16384 kB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,704+1%
6,635
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-9100FXeon E5-4620
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F) / not specified (Xeon E5-4620). Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-9100FXeon E5-4620
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9100F was priced at $97, while the Xeon E5-4620 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($97 vs $2141), Core i3-9100F was $2044 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100F delivers 69.1 pts/$ vs 3.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4620 — making the Core i3-9100F the 182.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-9100FXeon E5-4620
MSRP
$97-95%
$2141
Performance per Dollar
69.1+2129%
3.1
Release Date
2019
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.