Core i3-L13G4
VS
Core i7-9700K

Core i3-L13G4 vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-L13G4 is positioned at rank #1210 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-L13G4

#1198
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6113%
#1199
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6023%
#1200
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5529%
#1201
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5504%
#1202
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5454%
#1204
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5267%
#1205
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5050%
#1206
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5042%
#1207
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4906%
#1210
Core i3-L13G4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
99%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
97%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
95%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
92%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
87%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
85%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-9700K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-L13G4 in both compute-intensive tasks (165.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-L13G4Core i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-L13G4Core i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-L13G4 and Core i7-9700K

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Core i3-L13G4 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 0.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-L13G4 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-L13G4 scores 1,349 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 165.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
5 / 5
8 / 8+60%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+75%
Base Clock
0.8 GHz
3.6 GHz+350%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,349
14,397+967%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-L13G4 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR4x-4267 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i3-L13G4) vs 2 (Core i7-9700K). PCIe lanes: 8 (Core i3-L13G4) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i7-9700K
Socket
FC-CSP1016
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Desktop