Core i5-10210Y
VS
Core i5-2500K

Core i5-10210Y vs Core i5-2500K

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i5-2500K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-10210Y is positioned at rank 429 and the Core i5-2500K is on rank 828, so the Core i5-10210Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10210Y

#417
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
568%
#418
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
560%
#419
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
514%
#420
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
512%
#421
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
507%
#423
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
490%
#424
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
469%
#425
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
469%
#426
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
456%
#429
Core i5-10210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16941%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16008%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11623%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3501%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2774%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2426%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1390%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1372%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1249%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1249%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1235%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1201%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1185%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1180%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1169%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
100%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
100%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
100%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
99%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
99%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
99%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
98%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
98%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10210Y (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-10210YCore i5-2500K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-Y (2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500K (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-10210YCore i5-2500K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10210Y and Core i5-2500K

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-2500K

The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-2500K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-2500K uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the Core i5-2500K's 4,141 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2500K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,079 vs 684, a 44.8% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,380 vs 2,032 (15.8% advantage for the Core i5-10210Y). Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-10210YCore i5-2500K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
3.3 GHz+230%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-Y (2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,131
4,141
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,200
Geekbench 6 Single
1,079+58%
684
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,380+17%
2,032
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2500K uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500K — the Core i5-10210Y supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2500K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-10210Y) vs 16 (Core i5-2500K) — the Core i5-2500K offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-10210Y) and P67,Z68,Z77 (Core i5-2500K).

FeatureCore i5-10210YCore i5-2500K
Socket
UTFCBGA1377
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 2133 MHz
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-2500K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-10210Y) vs VT-x (Core i5-2500K). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-10210Y) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2500K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power, Core i5-2500K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.

FeatureCore i5-10210YCore i5-2500K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile Low Power
Gaming