
Core i5-1030NG7

Opteron 6238
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6238 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6238 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6238: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1030NG7
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 10W instead of 115W, a 105W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Opteron 6238 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6238 across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,600 vs 5,625).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6238, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Opteron 6238
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $455 MSRP, while Core i5-1030NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β1050% higher power demand at 115W vs 10W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-1030NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6238 better than Core i5-1030NG7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6238 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1030NG7
The Core i5-1030NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6238
The Opteron 6238 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011β2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,625 points. Launch price was $455.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1030NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6238 offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the Opteron 6238 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-1030NG7 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6238 β a 9% clock advantage for the Core i5-1030NG7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6238 uses Interlagos (2011β2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1030NG7 scores 5,600 against the Opteron 6238's 5,625 β a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6238. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1030NG7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6238.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz+136% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-Y (2020) | Interlagos (2011β2012) |
| PassMark | 5,600 | 5,625 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,239 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6238 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1044 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1030NG7) / not specified (Opteron 6238). The Core i5-1030NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Opteron 6238 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1030NG7 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1030NG7 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















