
Core i5-1030NG7

Opteron 6274
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6274 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6274 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

ARC Raiders

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight

Delta Force

Left 4 Dead 2
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6274: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1030NG7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 115W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Opteron 6274 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6274 across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,600 vs 5,643).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6274, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6274
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $639 MSRP, while Core i5-1030NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1050% higher power demand at 115W vs 10W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1030NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6274 better than Core i5-1030NG7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Opteron 6274 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1030NG7
The Core i5-1030NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6274
The Opteron 6274 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,643 points. Launch price was $909.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1030NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6274 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6274 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-1030NG7 versus 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6274 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1030NG7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6274 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1030NG7 scores 5,600 against the Opteron 6274's 5,643 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6274. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1030NG7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6274.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8.00391 MB (per core)+3102% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-Y (2020) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,600 | 5,643 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,239 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6274 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1044 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1030NG7) / not specified (Opteron 6274). The Core i5-1030NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Opteron 6274 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1030NG7 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1030NG7 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1030NG7 | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















