Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-1030NG7

4 / 8

5,600

0.0%

5,639

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1030NG7

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,600 vs 5,639).

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1030NG7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1030NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1030NG7 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-1030NG7 is ahead with a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i5-1030NG7 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1030NG7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1030NG7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1030NG7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1030NG7

The Core i5-1030NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,639 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1030NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-1030NG7 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-1030NG7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1030NG7 scores 5,600 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 5,639 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1030NG7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

Feature	Core i5-1030NG7	Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2 GHz+82%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-Y (2020)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,600	5,639
Geekbench 6 Single	1,239	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1030NG7 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1030NG7	Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Socket	BGA1044	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1030NG7) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U). The Core i5-1030NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1030NG7 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1030NG7 rivals Ryzen 5 4500U.