Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400

6 / 12

11,988

+0.9%

11,882

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $123 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $305 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.9 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $305 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C14 moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen Embedded V3C14

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,882 vs 11,988).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 65.9 PassMark/$ ($305 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400 better than Ryzen Embedded V3C14?

Yes. Core i5-10400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400 is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400 comes in $123 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $305 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 69.1% better value on MSRP (65.9 vs 39.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C14 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C14 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400

The Core i5-10400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,988 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded V3C14

The Ryzen Embedded V3C14 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,882 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400 scores 11,988 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C14's 11,882 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10400. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C14.

Feature	Core i5-10400	Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark	11,988	11,882
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,313	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400	Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Socket	LGA1200	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C14). The Core i5-10400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400	Ryzen Embedded V3C14
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400 was priced at $182, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 came in at $305. On launch pricing ($182 vs $305), Core i5-10400 was $123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400 delivers 65.9 pts/$ vs 39.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V3C14 — making the Core i5-10400 the 51.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400	Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP	$182-40%	$305
Performance per Dollar	65.9+69%	39.0
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Core i5-10400 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded V3C14 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.