Core i5-10400
VS
Ryzen Z2 Go

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen Z2 Go

Intel

Core i5-10400

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400

#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
107%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
107%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
107%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
105%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
48%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
105%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
104%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
104%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
103%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
103%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
45%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
42%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
103%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
102%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
42%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
102%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
102%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
101%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
40%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
40%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
100%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
100%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
98%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
32%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
97%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
97%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
97%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
31%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Z2 Go

#923
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1685%
#924
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1661%
#925
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1524%
#926
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1518%
#927
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1504%
#929
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1452%
#930
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1392%
#931
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1390%
#932
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1353%
#935
Ryzen Z2 Go
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen Z2 Go leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-10400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-10400Ryzen Z2 Go
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt R (2025) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-10400Ryzen Z2 Go
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400 and Ryzen Z2 Go

Intel

Core i5-10400

The Core i5-10400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,988 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400 scores 11,988 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,313 vs 5,802 (35.6% advantage for the Core i5-10400). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,600 vs 1,842, a 14.1% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.

FeatureCore i5-10400Ryzen Z2 Go
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rembrandt R (2025)
PassMark
11,988
12,188+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,313+43%
5,802
Geekbench 6 Single
1,600
1,842+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,073
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400 versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Z2 Go — the Ryzen Z2 Go supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 400-series (Core i5-10400) and Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go).

FeatureCore i5-10400Ryzen Z2 Go
Socket
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
LPDDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400) vs SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-10400) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen Z2 Go) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400 targets Gaming, Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400 rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.

FeatureCore i5-10400Ryzen Z2 Go
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
SVM
Target Use
Gaming
Budget