Core i5-10400
VS
Xeon E5-2692 v2

Core i5-10400 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

Intel

Core i5-10400

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2692 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400

#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
107%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
107%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
107%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
105%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
48%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
105%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
104%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
104%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
103%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
103%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
45%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
42%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
103%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
102%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
42%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
102%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
102%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
101%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
40%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
40%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
100%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
100%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
98%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
32%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
97%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
97%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
97%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
31%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2692 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4287%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
809%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
719%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
556%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
100%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
99%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
98%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
97%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
97%
#275
Xeon E5-2692 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#282
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10400 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-10400Xeon E5-2692 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-10400Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400 and Xeon E5-2692 v2

Intel

Core i5-10400

The Core i5-10400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,988 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400 scores 11,988 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2692 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

FeatureCore i5-10400Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+43%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+32%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
11,988
12,119+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,313
Geekbench 6 Single
1,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400Xeon E5-2692 v2
Socket
LGA1200
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400) / not specified (Xeon E5-2692 v2). The Core i5-10400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400Xeon E5-2692 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming