Core i5-1140G7 vs Opteron 6386 SE

Core i5-1140G7 vs Opteron 6386 SE Performance Spectrum

Core i5-1140G7

4 / 8

8,471

+2.2%

8,291

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Opteron 6386 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Opteron 6386 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 140W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6386 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6386 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6386 SE

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,291 vs 8,471).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,392 MSRP, while Core i5-1140G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2700% higher power demand at 140W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1140G7 better than Opteron 6386 SE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6386 SE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1140G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1140G7 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6386 SE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-1140G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,392 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6386 SE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6386 SE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1140G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Opteron 6386 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6386 SE

The Opteron 6386 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $2,408.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1140G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6386 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6386 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 6386 SE — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the Opteron 6386 SE's 8,291 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i5-1140G7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	Core i5-1140G7	Opteron 6386 SE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	5 MB	16 MB+220%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	8,471+2%	8,291

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.