Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2470

Intel

Core i5-1140G7

4 Cores8 Thrd5 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2470

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2470 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

  • +1.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 5W instead of 95W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2470 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-2470

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,329 vs 8,471).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,440 MSRP, while Core i5-1140G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1800% higher power demand at 95W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1140G7 better than Xeon E5-2470?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2470 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1140G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-1140G7 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2470 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-1140G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,440 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2470 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2470 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1140G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2470

The Xeon E5-2470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,329 points. Launch price was $1,480.

Processing Power

The Core i5-1140G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2470 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2470 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2470 — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2470 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the Xeon E5-2470's 8,329 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-1140G7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2470.

FeatureCore i5-1140G7Xeon E5-2470
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+35%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
8 MB
20480 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
5 MB+1900%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
8,471+2%
8,329
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2470 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-1140G7Xeon E5-2470
Socket
FCBGA1598
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0