Core i5-11600T
VS
Xeon E5-2697 v2

Core i5-11600T vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

Intel

Core i5-11600T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-11600T

#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
109%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
108%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
108%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
108%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
108%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
106%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
106%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
106%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
105%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
104%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
102%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
102%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
102%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
101%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
101%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
100%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
99%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
99%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
96%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
95%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
95%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
94%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
94%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
94%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
93%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
93%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
92%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v2

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#183
Xeon E5-2697 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-11600T (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-11600TXeon E5-2697 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($262)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake (2021) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-11600TXeon E5-2697 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($262)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11600T and Xeon E5-2697 v2

Intel

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11600T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-11600T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600T scores 14,447 against the Xeon E5-2697 v2's 14,267 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-11600T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureCore i5-11600TXeon E5-2697 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+17%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.7 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake (2021)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
14,447+1%
14,267
Geekbench 6 Single
1,856
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,455
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11600T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11600T versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — the Core i5-11600T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-11600T) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11600T) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i5-11600T) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2).

FeatureCore i5-11600TXeon E5-2697 v2
Socket
LGA1200
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
768 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
40+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2). The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.

FeatureCore i5-11600TXeon E5-2697 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD 750
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming