
Core i5-11600T

Xeon W-1250P
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-1250P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-1250P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-1250P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11600T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.1 vs 45.8 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1250P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-1250P
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,259 vs 14,447).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.8 vs 55.1 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11600T better than Xeon W-1250P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-1250P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600T
The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1250P
The Xeon W-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,259 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11600T and Xeon W-1250P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1250P — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1250P (base: 1.7 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i5-11600T is built on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-11600T scores 14,447 against the Xeon W-1250P's 14,259 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-11600T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250P.
| Feature | Core i5-11600T | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz+141% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 14,447+1% | 14,259 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,856 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,455 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Core i5-11600T | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T) / not specified (Xeon W-1250P). The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon W-1250P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.
| Feature | Core i5-11600T | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11600T was priced at $262, while the Xeon W-1250P came in at $311. On launch pricing ($262 vs $311), Core i5-11600T was $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600T delivers 55.1 pts/$ vs 45.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1250P — making the Core i5-11600T the 18.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11600T | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-16% | $311 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.1+20% | 45.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














