Core i5-3360M vs Xeon X5470

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3360M vs Xeon X5470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3360M vs Xeon X5470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3360M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon X5470 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5470 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5470, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌326.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 120W.

Xeon X5470

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 120W instead of 512W, a 392W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,869 vs 2,892).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3360M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3360M better than Xeon X5470?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5470 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3360M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3360M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3360M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3360M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3360M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3360M vs Xeon X5470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3360M

The Core i5-3360M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $266.

Xeon X5470

The Xeon X5470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,869 points. Launch price was $1,386.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3360M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5470 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5470 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3360M versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon X5470 — a 165.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3360M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i5-3360M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5470 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3360M scores 2,892 against the Xeon X5470's 2,869 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-3360M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3360M vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5470.

Feature	Core i5-3360M	Xeon X5470
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+961%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.33 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,892	2,869

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3360M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5470 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3360M	Xeon X5470
Socket	PGA988	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-3360M) / not specified (Xeon X5470). The Core i5-3360M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon X5470 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3360M rivals AMD A10-4600M.